I don't usually get involved in forums, the main reason being I like to know who I'm talking to and who might be replying, (The Jack Straw syndrome), so I'm going to ask anyone who does reply to do so in their own name. In fact why not do so all the time then newcomers like me, who occasionally get mentioned, criticised, etc at least have the knowledge of who's saying what.
But to business and first the background to new 'members'.
The Corus situation has resulted in us losing a number of 'works' members and a subsequent loss of income. What happens in future is a guess, but this category of membership is not going to increase. Faced with this we have a decision. Do we continue to allow income to continue to fall and allow standards at the ponds fall with them or do we take action. To me it's a no brainer, we have achieved a lot, I personally do not intend to let it slide, without a fight anyway.
As a result your committee has begun drawing up plans for the next 5 years, open book any suggestions welcome and some are really outside the box. As an example there appears to be a large demand for carp fishing, how can we accomodate this, maximse benefit? Convert another pond, share one, find another? As you can imagine some of these suggestions make other anglers extremely nervous.
One thing is clear we need to maximise income and a massive effort is going to be made to raise the number of ordinary members so if you know of any...Another action was to offer six monthly membership for a limited (10) number of carp anglers over the winter and bring in a most useful £500. I think Steve has explained so I'll not go on. I'm sorry if some don't like the idea, or can't accept our position, think it stinks or that we are money grabbers. I'm sure those who don't think we offer value for money will find pastures new. For the rest we need your support and ideas.
I ought to mention now that we have another potential problem. Our insurers have asked if we allow alcohol to be consumed on the bank. They are concerned by a number of accidents involving 'specimen' anglers where alcohol hads been a
contributory factor and are considering a 'no alcohol' clause in future. Although drugs are not mentioned their use would obviously be implied. Since we cannot operate without insurance the consequences may be serious. We need to find some sort of solution before it is forced upon us. Your views are most welcome.
Finally I have to comment again about general behaviour. Today I have to write to two anglers who have in my mind 'let the side down'. We do not make rules to be akward, we ask that people behave responsibly. We try not to be overbearing but understanding. It seems however despite how hard we try some always take things to the extreme or simply do silly things and others suffer the backlash. Perhaps we need to be more particular about who gets a permit next year, perhaps we just operate a no tolerance policy in future.
If we are to continue to move forward we must all pull together. Please let me have your thoughts, good...or bad
Martin